Cases 41 - 50 of 5,576
McCallister v. Davis et al
as 2:2019cv00239
Plaintiff:
David H. McCallister
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical Branch Institution Division, Director's Medical and Dental Department, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crayton v. Director et al
as 6:2019cv00274
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Crayton and Big Ant
Defendant:
FNU Baker, Travis Turner, TDCJ Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowell Green v. William Stephens, et al
as 19-20421
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS and RESSIE OWENS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOWELL QUINCY GREEN
Christopher Torres v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 19-40470
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BRYAN TORRES
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD FUNAI, EDGAR BAKER, JR., WILLIAM STEPHENS and others
Stout v. Stephens et al
as 4:2019cv02152
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Rissie Owens, William Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Lawson v. William Stephens, et al
as 19-10398
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN, Custodian of Offender Records, JAMES P. ANDERS, Assistant Warden at the James V. Allred Unit, MAILROOM SYSTEM COORDINATOR'S PANEL, Director, individually and in their official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL EUGENE LAWSON
Appellant:
RANDALL SCOTT JORDAN
Favela v. Collier et al
as 9:2019cv00093
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Richard Alford, William Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Gerardo Favela, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Hawes v. William Stephens, et al
as 19-40341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER HAWES
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, BRAD LIVINGSTON and PAMELA PACE
Brandon Richardson v. Brandon Belote, et al
as 19-40282
Defendant / Appellee:
THADDEUS HUNT, SAQUED SALINAS, BRANDON BELOTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON RICHARDSON
William Lush, II v. IRS
as 19-20107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM STEPHEN LUSH, II
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
