Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Nielsen v. USA
as 9:2015cv00037
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Richard Nielsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-35288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vartanian v. Dalrymple et al
as 4:2014cv00665
Plaintiff:
Gregory Vartanian
Defendant:
William Richard Dalrymple and Brandy Mathers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-35062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lamb et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03101
Plaintiff:
Eva Lamb , Patricia Lambert , James A. Lancaster and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, SmithKline Beecham Corporation and Joseph A. Nichols, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
James Campbell Company, LLC v. Luamea et al
as 1:2013cv00243
Plaintiff:
James Campbell Company, LLC
Defendant:
Heirs or Assigns of Luamea, Heirs or Assigns of Kaaumoa, William Richards Castle Heirs or Assigns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
James Campbell Company LLC v. Heirs or Assigns of Kawaa et al
as 1:2013cv00248
Plaintiff:
James Campbell Company LLC
Defendant:
Heirs or Assigns of Kawaa, William Richards Castle Heirs or Assigns, Margaret or her Heirs or Assigns Farlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
USA v. William Nielsen
as 12-30378
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM RICHARD NIELSEN
Ronald Lais v. William Froeberg, et al
as 12-56770
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD EUGENE LAIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM RICHARD FROEBERG and ROSEANNE M. FROEBERG
In re: William R. Goode, Esq.
as 12-80171
Respondent:
In re: WILLIAM RICHARD GOODE, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: July 14, 1988
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
