Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Boldrini et al v. Giovannini et al
as 3:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini, Michael J. Pega, Jr. and Daniele A. Boldrini
Defendant:
Joseph P. Giovannini, Mary Pamela Amos, Marianne Cameli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SCHLIPF et al
as 1:2021cv00176
Defendant:
BRITTANY TENON, RYAN SCHLIPF, BRITTANY SCHLIPF and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Wills v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2020cv00295
Plaintiff:
John Daniel Wills
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Underwood v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2019cv01634
Defendant:
Tom Wolfe, Morgan C. David, A. Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHARLES v. HOPE CAFFAE/COFFEE SHOP et al
as 2:2019cv04238
Plaintiff:
PETER CHARLES
Defendant:
BETHESDA PROJECT, STARBUCKS ON 3RD AND SOUTH, HOPE CAFFAE/COFFEE SHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLS v. THE STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv00010
Defendant:
THE STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WILLS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
MICHAEL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv04405
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER CHAD GUGGER, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE, POLICE OFFICER HOUSER and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MICHAEL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SUI JURIS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv03633
Defendant:
ROBERT J. RADARO, JOHN J. WHELAN, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff:
DOMONIQUE JORDAN SUI JURIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
