Cases 41 - 50 of 124
Parkhurst v. Lampert, et al
as 16-8055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK R. PARKHURST
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT LAMPERT, Director of the Wyoming Department of Corrections, EDDIE WILSON, Warden o f the Wyoming State Penitentiary, JOHN DOE, Manufacturer of the Pepper-Spray Gas known as "Fantom" and others
Public Service Company of NM v. Barboan, et al
as 16-2050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO, a New Mexico Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
LORRAINE J. BARBOAN, LAURA H. CHACO, BENJAMIN A. HOUSE and others
Defendant:
TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC, APPROXIMATELY 15.49 ACRES OF LAND, IN MCKINLEY COUNTY, NEW MEXICO, NAVAJO TRIBAL UTILITY AUTHORITY and others
Rife v. McCurtain County Jail Trust, et al
as 16-7019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLYDE ALLEN RIFE
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, JOE JEFFERSON, State Trooper, CHAD DALE and others
Public Service Co. v. Barboan, et al
as 16-700
Petitioner:
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO, a New Mexico Corporation
Defendant Counterclaimant - Respondent:
LORRAINE J. BARBOAN, LAURA H. CHACO, BENJAMIN A, HOUSE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NAVAJO NATION
United States v. Yazzie
as 15-2199
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIS YAZZIE
Green v. Sirmons, et al
as 15-7074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTY SIRMONS, OSP, DEBBIE ALDRIDGE, Unit ManagerOSP, A. LIGHTLE, Deputy Warden-OSP and others
Oppenheimerfunds, et al v. Stockwell, et al
as 15-706
Petitioner:
OPPENHEIMERFUNDS, INC, JOHN V. MURPHY, OPPENHEIMERFUNDS DISTRIBUTOR, INC. and others
Respondent:
ROBERT RIVERA, STEPHEN LOWE, FRANK TACKMANN and others
:
, , and others
Jones v. McGuire, et al
as 15-3218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH L. MCGUIRE, JAMES HEIMGARTNER and VICKIE BRUMGARDT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
