Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Wingfield v. Phams
as 1:2024cv02221
Petitioner:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Respondent:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wingfield v. Clegg et al
as 1:2024cv02220
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Defendant:
Thomas Scott Clegg, Jeffrey Mann and Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingfield v. Pham
as 1:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wingfield
Defendant:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Alto Asset Company 4, LLC v. Wingfield
as 1:2023cv02858
Plaintiff:
Alto Asset Company 4, LLC
Defendant:
Laquita Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wingfield v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv00116
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
James Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wingfield v. Mann et al
as 1:2020cv02136
Defendant:
Jeffrey Mann, Michael L. Thurmond, Melody M. Maddox and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Wingfield et al
as 6:2019cv00063
Defendant:
Sgt. Lawerence, Officer Eric Wingfield, Cpt. Martha Dukes and others
Plaintiff:
James Joseph Brian Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILLSMAN v. QUICK, et al
as 3:2019cv00031
Plaintiff:
RAKEIM HILLSMAN, RAKEMIN JAQUIN HILLSMAN, RAKEIM JAQUIN HILLSMAN and others
Defendant:
JUDGE PATRICIA BARRON, ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY, MADISON COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wingfield v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2018cv05284
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Crystal Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
