Cases 11 - 20 of 734
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Woods v. Wiza et al
as 1:2024cv00575
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza and Rutledge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
FABIAN WOODS, JR and Fabian Woods, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Jackson and JOCELYN WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West Coast Life Insurance Company v. Wood et al
as 1:2024cv00293
Intervenor:
West Coast Life Insurance Company, Connie Wood and Aura Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
SULLIVAN v. WARD et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
MARIO ROMOAN SULLIVAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN WALTER BARRY, WARDEN DARRIN MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
FABIAN WOODS, JR and Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
SGT. SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. JACKSON et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Defendant:
MARK JACKSON and JOCELYN WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. WIZA
as 4:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Respondent:
Warden SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. WEST et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Defendant:
Lieutenant ADRIAN WEST, Warden LETITIA BURKS, ANTHONY ANTONIO HAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
