Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Woods v. Dubuque County Jail
as 2:2009cv01030
Plaintiff:
Brian Thomas Woods
Defendant:
Dubuque County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2008cv00295
Plaintiff:
Steven W. Woods
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Wood v. Qwest Communications International et al
as 4:2008cv00018
Plaintiff:
Gladys M Wood and Gladys M Wood
Defendant:
Qwest Communications International, Qwest Corporation and Qwest Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Beckman et al v. George
as 4:2007cv00502
Plaintiff:
Bobby Neil Beckman and Adam Woods
Defendant:
Dan George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. City of Marion et al
as 1:2007cv00110
Plaintiff:
George L Wood and George L Wood
Defendant:
City of Marion, City of Marion, Ron Slagle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Sonneman et al
as 4:2007cv00416
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Woods
Defendant:
Tad D. Sonneman, United States of America and Julie A. Sonneman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Ti
Williams v. Cornelius et al
as 4:2007cv00363
Plaintiff:
Emmitt Lee Williams
Defendant:
Chuck Cornelius, Michael Woods and Amanda Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Williams v. Cornelius et al
as 4:2007cv00305
Plaintiff:
Emmitt Lee Williams
Defendant:
Charles Cornelius, Michael Woods and Amanda Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Cornelius et al
as 1:2007cv00062
Petitioner:
Emmitt Lee Williams
Defendant:
Chuck Cornelius, Michael Woods and Amanda Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
