Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Ader v. NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01759
Plaintiff:
Ali Ader
Defendant:
NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., William J. Rieflin, David V. Goeddel and others
Woodhouse v. Juul Labs, Inc., previously d/b/a as Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08529
Plaintiff:
Conor Woodhouse
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Benjamin Woodhouse v. The United States Government et al
as 2:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Mr. Benjamin Woodhouse
Defendant:
U.S. Government, Otis D Wright III, Fernando M Olguin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Mr. Benjamin Woodhouse et al v. The United States Government et al
as 2:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Havensight Capital LLC, Mr. Benjamin Woodhouse, Havensight Capital L.L.C. and others
Petitioner:
Hon. Manuel Real
Defendant:
Nike Inc., Facebook Inc., Alphabet Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Benjamin Woodhouse v. The United States Government et al
as 2:2021cv06372
Plaintiff:
Mr. Benjamin Woodhouse and Benjamin Woodhouse
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc., Nike Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woodhouse v. Anglea
as 4:2019cv04546
Petitioner:
Keith E. Woodhouse
Defendant:
H. B. Anglea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woodhouse v. Anglea
as 3:2018cv01874
Petitioner:
Keith E. Woodhouse
Respondent:
H. B. Anglea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scarlett v. The County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2016cv05418
Plaintiff:
Sidney Theodore Scarlett
Defendant:
The County of Santa Clara, The Santa Clara County, Jeffrey F. Rosen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gash v. Kenis et al
as 3:2016cv00973
Plaintiff:
Roy Davis Gash
Defendant:
Paul R Kenis, Judith Kenis, Lillian Woodhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02032
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
