Cases 41 - 50 of 261
Service Employees Pension Fund of Upstate New York et al v. Blossom North, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00901
Plaintiff:
Mark Curletta, John Murray, Terrence Gorman and others
Defendant:
Gerald Wood, Blossom North, LLC doing business as Blossom North Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center, Steve O'Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Butchino v. City of Plattsburgh et al
as 8:2020cv00796
Defendant:
Chad Welch, Mike Doe, Adam Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Butchino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reynolds v. O'Gorman et al
as 9:2020cv00686
Defendant:
D. Bombaidier, C.O. McShane, J. Ormby and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Joseph Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Annucci et al
as 9:2020cv00570
Defendant:
Jill Grant, John or Jane Does 11-15, Joseph Bellnier and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00539
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Santos v. Wood et al
as 9:2020cv00421
Defendant:
Laura Oskia-Michales, John Doe #1, Robert A. Ruppel and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sealed Defendant # 1 v. USA
as 5:2020cv00287
Petitioner:
Michael C. Woods
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sealed Defendant # 1 v. USA
as 5:2020cv00237
Petitioner:
Michael C. Woods
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00123
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
