Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Saunders v. Diamond Pharmacy Services et al
as 3:2022cv01924
Plaintiff:
Antonio Saunders
Defendant:
Diamond Pharmacy Services, Lupin Pharm. Corp, Novartis Pharm. Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Perez v. Ransome et al
as 1:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
Francisco Perez
Defendant:
Superintendent Kevin Ransome, SCI Dallas Medical Department, Bureau of Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOLFOLK v. MEIER et al
as 2:2017cv03513
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOOLFOLK
Defendant:
MEIER, EDWARD D. MCFADDEN, TERENCE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOLFOLK v. COLVIN
as 2:2016cv04668
Plaintiff:
ROGER OTIS WOOLFOLK
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WOOLFOLK et al v. H.K. COMPANY PORTER et al
as 2:2011cv67205
Plaintiff:
JAMES PALLISON WOOLFOLK and EDNA WOOLFOLK
Defendant:
H.K. COMPANY PORTER, KEENE CORPORATION, NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WOOLFOLK v. A-BEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv73221
Plaintiff:
LARRY A WOOLFOLK, LARRY A WOOLFOLK, LARRY A WOOLFOLK and others
Defendant:
A-BEX CORPORATION, A-BEX CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD., ATLAS TURNER, INC., LAC D'AMIANTE DU QUEBEC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ALLEN et al v. A.C.AND S.INC.,ET AL
as 2:2007cv66349
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA A. ALLEN, MARCELLOUS BARNEY, WINIFRED N. BATTS and others
Defendant:
A C AND S, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
