Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv11958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv11960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCellon v. Haverhill Bank
as 1:2011cv11948
Plaintiff:
Varian McCellon
Defendant:
Haverhill Bank, John Does and X Y Z Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sabree v. Ireland et al
as 4:2011cv40192
Defendant:
Roderick L. Ireland, Francis X. Spina, Judith A. Cowin and others
Plaintiff:
G. Saif Sabree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farahani v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2010cv10783
Plaintiff:
Ghodrat Farahani
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company , Insurance Co X, Y Z and Companies X, Y, Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bertrand et al v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 4:2010cv40039
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Bertrand and James Bertrand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv10199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Curry v. Marshall et al
as 1:2010cv10142
Plaintiff:
Kevin P. Curry
Defendant:
Margaret Marshall, Roderick Ireland, Judith Cowin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thermo Niton Analyzers LLC v. Innov-X Systems, Inc.
as 1:2009cv12053
Plaintiff:
Thermo Niton Analyzers LLC
Defendant:
Innov-X Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 548 Unfair and Deceptive Trade Acts
Innov-X Systems, Inc. v. Austin Automation and Instrumentation, Inc.
as 1:2009cv11827
Plaintiff:
Innov-X Systems, Inc. and Innov-X Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Austin Automation and Instrumentation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
