Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mitchell v. London et al
as 1:2023cv15965
Plaintiff:
Keith Mitchell
Defendant:
Jeffrey London and XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Betts v. XPO Logistics Freight Inc
as 4:2023cv04161
Plaintiff:
Ryan Betts
Defendant:
XPO Logistics Freight Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Ramirez v. Norment et al
as 3:2022cv00454
Plaintiff:
Louis Rodriguez Ramirez
Defendant:
Timothy Norment and XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
DeJaynes et al v. Powell et al
as 3:2021cv50345
Plaintiff:
Andrew DeJaynes and Amber DeJaynes
Defendant:
LaMark Powell and XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Orth v. Augustyn
as 2:2020cv00120
Plaintiff:
Michael Orth
Defendant:
XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. f/k/a Con-way Freight, Inc., Joseph Augustyn and Con Way Trans Services, Inc
Not Classified By Court:
Thomas W Webber, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DeJaynes et al v. Powell et al
as 3:2020cv50048
Plaintiff:
Amber DeJaynes and Andrew DeJaynes
Defendant:
XPO Logistics, Inc., LaMark Powell and XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hackman v. XPO Logistics Inc
as 1:2019cv01303
Defendant:
XPO Logistics Freight, Inc., XPO Logistics, Inc., XPO Logistics Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Hackman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03121
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
