Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Banurs v. Li Auto Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03470
Plaintiff:
Dinesh Banurs
Defendant:
Li Auto Inc., Xiang Li, Tie Li and others
Gerald J. Lofaro v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01091
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Lofaro
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, YubBuilding, guangzhouweimingshangmaoyouxiangongsi and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Howard Robinson v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Howard Robinson
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Minquan County Lianhong Trading Co., Ltd., DOULM and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
In re: NIO, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 23-1190
Petitioner:
NIO Inc., Bin Li, Louis T. Hsieh and others
Respondent:
Jonathan Tan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Eva Huang
Li v. Wooten
as 23-60016
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Xiang Li and Tengfei Wang
Defendant / Appellant:
Sharron Wooten, doing business as Earthly Angels Surrogacy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Li et al v. Wooten
as 3:2020cv00008
Plaintiff:
Tengfei Wang and Xiang Li
Defendant:
Sharron Wooten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
