Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Arbor Global Strategies LLC v. Xilinx, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01986
Plaintiff: Arbor Global Strategies LLC
Defendant: Xilinx, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1
Globalfoundries U.S. Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01576
Defendant: Xilinx, Inc. and Mouser Electronics, Inc.
Plaintiff: Globalfoundries U.S. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Globalfoundries U.S. Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01573
Defendant: Xilinx, Inc. and Mouser Electronics, Inc.
Plaintiff: Globalfoundries U.S. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
John Neblett v. Louis Brothers, et al
as 19-5791
Defendant / Appellee: AEROFLEX COLORADO SPRINGS, INC., XILINX INC., UNITED STATES TRUSTEE and others
Defendant: QUALITY COMPONENTS, INC. and LOUIS J. BROTHERS
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN P. NEBLETT, as Chapter 7 Trustee of Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc.
Lucio Development LLC v. Xilinx, Inc.
as 6:2017cv00688
Plaintiff: Lucio Development LLC
Defendant: Xilinx, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. Xilinx, Inc.,
as 3:2017cv06376
Plaintiff: Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
Defendant: Xilinx Inc
Mediator: David Folsom
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Anza Technology, Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc.
as 3:2017cv06302
Plaintiff: Anza Technology, Inc.
Defendant: Xilinx Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101
Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. Xilinx, Inc.
as 5:2017mc80116
Plaintiff: Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
Defendant: Xilinx, Inc.
Movant: UMC Group (USA)
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Savithri v. Xilinx Inc
as 3:2017cv01609
Plaintiff: Nagaraj Savithri
Defendant: Xilinx Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Anza Technology, Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00687
Plaintiff: Anza Technology, Inc.
Defendant: Xilinx, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?