Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Cynthia Robinson v. Yakama Indian Nation and Code
as 16-35729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CYNTHIA A. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
YAKAMA INDIAN NATION AND CODE OF ETHICS
Robinson v. Yakama Indian Nation and Code of Ethics
as 1:2016cv03053
Defendant:
Yakama Indian Nation and Code of Ethics
Plaintiff:
Cynthia A Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Confederated Tribes and Bands v. Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Tr, et al
as 14-35165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA INDIAN NATION
Defendant - Appellee:
ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO TAX AND TRADE BUREAU, JOHN J. MANFREDA, in his offiical capacity as Administrator of the Alcohol and Tabacco Tax and Trade Bureau, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
USA, et al v. State of Washington
as 13-35519
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE, SAUK-SUIATTLE TRIBE, STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
USA, et al v. State of Washington
as 13-35474
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE, SAUK-SUIATTLE TRIBE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
King Mountain Tobacco Company, Inc. et al v. Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau et al
as 2:2011cv03038
Plaintiff:
King Mountain Tobacco Company Inc , Delbert Wheeler and Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation
Defendant:
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, John J Manfreda, United States Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Oregon et al
as 3:1968cv00513
Intervenor Defendant:
Alaska Trollers Association
503) 222-4428 (fax:
Bradford H. Lamb
Amicu:
Columbia River Fisherman's Protective Union, Lummi Inidan Nation, Northwest Gillnetter's Association and others
Intervenor:
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Indian Nation and others
Respondent:
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation and Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Unknown:
Bruce E Didesch, Alan C Stay, Deborah E. Nelson and others
503) 226-0259 (fax:
Robert C. Weaver, Jr.
509) 634-2387 (fax:
Stephen H. Suagee and Stephen H. Suagee
503) 242-9001 (fax:
Craig J. Dorsay and Lea Ann Easton
303) 673-9155 (fax:
Christopher B. Leahy
202) 616-9667 (fax:
Fred R. Disheroon, Fred R. Disheroon, Fred R. Disheroon and others
541) 737-3590 (fax:
Dr. Howard F. Horton, Ph.D.
208) 334-2690 (fax:
William Stuart Whelan
Defendant:
Makah Tribe, State of Oregon and State of Washington
503) 467-7689 (fax:
Robert S. Banks, Jr.
503) 947-4793 (fax:
David Euan Leith
503) 226-0079 (fax:
Lori Irish Bauman
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3371 Wildlife Under the Lacey Act
S'Klallam, et al v. Lummi Indian Tribe, et al
as 09-35772
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOWER ELWHA BAND OF KLALLAMS, Lower Elwha Band of S'Klallams, JAMESTOWN BAND OF KLALLAMS, Jamestown Band of S'Klallams and PORT GAMBLE BAND CLALLAM, Pt. Gamble Band of S'Klallams
Real-party-in-interest - Appellee:
TULALIP TRIBE
Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
LUMMI INDIAN TRIBE
Real-party-in-interest:
PUYALLUP TRIBE, MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE, SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE and others
Confederated Tribes and Bands, et al v. Confederated Tribes of the Col, et al
as 08-35961
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent - Appellee:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COLVILLE INDIAN RESERVATION
Defendant:
STATE OF OREGON and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA INDIAN NATION
Confederated Tribes and Bands, et al v. Confederated Tribes of the Col, et al
as 08-35963
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent - Appellant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COLVILLE INDIAN RESERVATION
Defendant:
STATE OF OREGON and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellee:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA INDIAN NATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
