Cases 1 - 10 of 176
Young v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv10888
Plaintiff:
Carette Young
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Duarte v. Bridgewater State Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv10592
Plaintiff:
Eric J Duarte
Defendant:
Bridgewater State Hospital, Carol A. Mici, Steven Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jacobs v. Ernst & Young Investment Advisers LLP et al
as 1:2023cv13021
Plaintiff:
Mykle Jacobs
Defendant:
Ernst & Young Investment Advisers LLP and Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jeannite v. Sorokin et al
as 1:2023cv12854
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
J. Sorokin doing business as judge at supreme court and Young doing business as judge at supreme court
Young et al v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
as 1:2023cv12619
Plaintiff:
Eileen Young and John Young
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young et al v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv12612
Plaintiff:
Richard Young and Anna Young
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Espinoza v. Clinton et al
as 1:2023cv12606
Plaintiff:
Jose David Espinoza
Defendant:
Hillary Rodman Clinton, William G. Young, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Young v. Tesco, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12353
Plaintiff:
Adelia Young
Defendant:
Tesco, Inc. and Barton Lawrence Munro Jr.
Young et al v. Progress Software Corporation
as 1:2023cv12342
Plaintiff:
Charles Young and Elizabeth Peccatiello
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
