Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Family Mortgage, Inc. v. Yan et al
as 1:2023cv04288
Plaintiff:
Family Mortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
Yan Yan, Tiannan Zhou, EMC Lending Corporation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Spin Master Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv02861
Plaintiff:
Spin Master Ltd. and Spin Master, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Anhui Chongli Trading Co., Ltd., Bengbu Swan Gifts Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03929
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03594
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YAN YAN v. REGENCY OF PENN STATE UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2021cv03593
Plaintiff:
YAN YAN
Defendant:
REGENCY OF PENN STATE UNIVERSITY, TRUSTEE OF UNIVERSITY PENNSYLVANIA and FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
H-D U.S.A., LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv03581
Plaintiff:
H-D U.S.A., LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Amarzon-Automotive Parts, Lovef and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Li v. Session
as 18-1582
Petitioner:
Yan Yan Li
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
