Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Yassin Aref, et al v. Jeffrey Rosen, et al
as 20-5368
Defendant / Appellee:
Leslie Smith, Chief, Counter Terrorism Unit, Federal Bureau of Prisons, D. Scott Dodrill, Assistant Director, Correctional Programs Division and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Yassin Muhiddin Aref and Daniel McGowan
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kifah Jayyousi
Yassin Aref, et al v. Loretta Lynch, et al
as 15-5154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Yassin Muhiddin Aref, Kifah Jayyousi and Daniel McGowan
Defendant - Appellee:
Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisoners, D. Scott Dodrill, Assistant Director, Correctional Programs Division and others
Aref v. United States of America
as 13-4724
Petitioner:
Yassin Muhiddin Aref
Respondent:
United States of America
Aref v. USA
as 1:2013cv00822
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Yassin Muhiddin Aref
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hossain v. United States of America
as 13-2041
Petitioner - Appellant:
Mohammed Mosharref Hossain
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Yassin Muhiddin Aref
Hossain v. United States of America
as 11-2977
Petitioner - Appellant:
Mohammed Mosharref Hossain
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Yassin Muhiddin Aref
United States of America v. Aref
as 10-2094
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mohammed Mosharref Hossain
Defendant - Appellant:
Yassin Muhiddin Aref
AREF et al v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2010cv00539
Plaintiff:
YASSIN MUHIDDIN AREF , AVON TWITTY , DANIEL MCGOWAN and others
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, HARLEY LAPPIN, D. SCOTT DODRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Aref v. USA
as 1:2010cv00280
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Yassin Muhiddin Aref
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
