Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Yoshimoto v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Warren Yoshimoto, Kristin Barroga, Sean Kettley and others
Defendant:
Alaska Airlines, Inc. and Alaska Air Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Mirabelli et al v. Olson et al
as 3:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Mirabelli and Lori Ann West
Defendant:
Mark Olson, Frank Huston, Joan Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Johnson v. Weber et al
as 1:2021cv00180
Defendant:
Steven Bourne, Emily Porterfield, Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Weber, et al
as 20-1412
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN BOURNE, YOSHIMOTO, KATHLEEN BOYD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Weber et al
as 1:2020cv03263
Petitioner:
Cox
Respondent:
Ed Caley
Defendant:
Larry (I) Winegardner, Owens, James (I) Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Ghadiri v. 7 Eleven Store No. 37191 et al
as 8:2020cv00212
Plaintiff:
Adam Ghadiri
Defendant:
7-Eleven Store #37191, Onkar Singh, Arturo H. Yoshimoto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Johnson v. Winegardner et al
as 1:2019cv02971
Defendant:
Fagerstedt, Holland, Caley and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Yoshimoto v. Safeco Insurance Company Of Illinois
as 2:2017cv00382
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company Of Illinois
Plaintiff:
Wayne Yoshimoto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Yoshimoto v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08866
Plaintiff:
Dora B. Yoshimoto
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
