Cases 51 - 60 of 3,584
Young, Rodney v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv14021
Plaintiff:
Rodney Young
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laquil-Lavet Robinson v. Shonna Young Gay
as 24-10251
Plaintiff:
LAQUIL-LAVET ROBINSON
Defendant:
SHONNA YOUNG GAY
Albert Young v. Rashaun Robinson, et al
as 24-10210
Plaintiff:
ALBERT DEMETRIUS YOUNG
Defendant:
RASHAUN ROBINSON, SARAFINO LOVETTO, GABRIEL BROOKS and others
Young v. Garland
as 1:2024cv00217
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Respondent:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Britt v. Durham et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Defendant:
Chandler Durham, Turbo the Great, Warner-Chappell Music, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Britt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Highlands County et al
as 2:2024cv14005
Plaintiff:
Stephen Patrick Young
Defendant:
Highlands County, Highlands County Sheriff's Detective, Highlands County Sheriff's Attorney/ Deputy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Young v. USAA General Indemnity Company
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Leodis R Young, III
Defendant:
USAA General Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Heaven v. Ocala Police Department
as 5:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jerome Heaven, Jr and Jerome Young
Defendant:
Ocala Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
