Cases 1 - 10 of 16
CENTENO v. SHROCK TRUCKING, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00970
Plaintiff:
CARLOS CENTENO
Defendant:
SHROCK TRUCKING, INC. and ROBERT YOUNGBLOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE SPEAKEASY BAR AND GRILL, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
THE SPEAKEASY BAR & GRILL, LLC d/b/a THE BARRELHOUSE ON MARKET, BRANDON CRUTCHER and ARNIE YOUNGBLOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE SPEAKEASY BAR AND GRILL, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
THE SPEAKEASY BAR AND GRILL, LLC, BRANDON CRUTCHER, ARNIE YOUNGBLOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
YOUNGBLOOD v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02342
Plaintiff:
PAULA YOUNGBLOOD
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNGBLOOD v. STATE OF NEW YORK
as 2:2021cv00170
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK
Plaintiff:
ANDRE SHERICK YOUNGBLOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WHITE-BEY v. HOLCOMB
as 2:2020cv00332
Plaintiff:
DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY and DONYALL E. WHITE, ESTATE
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, W. DUNKLEY, WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00022
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Youngblood v. Superintendent
as 3:2017cv00039
Petitioner:
Leo D Youngblood
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YOUNGBLOOD v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00204
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
HENRY M. YOUNGBLOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Youngblood v. Superintendent
as 3:2011cv00196
Petitioner:
Tony M Youngblood
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
