Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Paul Johnson v. Thuddy, et al
as 23-15167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THUDDY, MD., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, MD and others
(PC) UValles v. Rueter et al
as 2:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Raul UValles
Defendant:
Kevin Rueter, Shina Patel, Yuen Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Johnson v. Thuddy, et al
as 22-16116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THUDDY, M.D., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, M.D. and others
Paul Johnson v. Joseph Chudy, et al
as 22-15050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH CHUDY, M.D., THUDDY, M.D., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D. and others
Paul Johnson v. Joseph Chudy, et al
as 21-16110
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director of CDCR, A. TRAQUINA, M.D., CMO, NORMA ACQUVA, M.D., HCM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Ossie Giles v. CA Corrections Health Care, et al
as 17-16861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSSIE GILES
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONS HEALTH CARE SERVICES, B. NAKU, Dr., T. TRAN, Dr and others
Jambri Sean Johnson, Sr. v. Ibrahim et al
as 2:2016cv00387
Plaintiff:
JamBri Sean Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Mohamed Ibrahim, Yuen Chen and Eric Arnolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jambri Sean Johnson, Sr. v. Ibrahim et al
as 1:2016cv00221
Plaintiff:
JamBri Sean Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Mohamed Ibrahim, Yuen Chen and Eric Arnolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. California Corrections Health Care Services et al
as 4:2015cv04838
Plaintiff:
Ossie Giles
Defendant:
California Corrections Health Care Services, B. Naku, T. Tran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06945
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
