Cases 1 - 10 of 900
(PS) Jensen v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 2:2024cv01289
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco Department of Child and Youth Services, County of Sacramento Department of Child, Family, and Adult Services, Emilia Patrick and others
Defendant:
Yvonne Jensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Cox, et al. v. Association of Oregon Corrections Employees, Inc., et al.
as 24-2763
Defendant:
COLETTE S. PETERS, in her official capacity as the Director of Oregon Department of Corrections, ASSOCIATION OF OREGON CORRECTIONS EMPLOYEES, INC., OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY COX, MARK COX, YVONNE WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Turner v. Rogers
as 24-2273
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, DISTRICT JUDGE, US District Court Judge
Curtis, et al. v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-1869
Plaintiff:
AILA CURTIS, CIERA AGEE, ALISON ARCHER and others
Defendant:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, PEACEHEALTH, LIZ DUNNE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Black v. Murphy et al
as 2:2024cv10634
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Black and Yvonne Black [E-filer]
Defendant:
Michael J. Murphy, Jason Pless, Reginald Van Wulfen and others
Workman v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 24-2033
Petitioner:
THOMAS WORKMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JASMINE MARTINEZ, ROBERT SALAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
