Cases 1 - 6 of 6
LULAC Texas et al v. Esparza et al
as 1:2021cv00786
Plaintiff:
Lulac Texas, Vote Latino, Texas Alliance for Retired Americans and others
Defendant:
Jose Esparza, Ken Paxton, Jacquelyn Callanen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
La Union Del Pueblo Entero, et al v. Gregory W. Abbott, et al
as 5:2021cv00844
Plaintiff:
La Union Del Pueblo Entero, Friendship-West Baptist Church, The Anti-Defamation League Austin, Southwest, and Texoma and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Isabel Longoria, Jacque Callanen, Yvonne Ramon and others
Defendant:
Jose A. Esparza, Lupe C. Torres, Gregory W. Abbott and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Houston Justice, Houston Area Urban League, Delta Sigma Theta Sorority Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Dana DeBeauvoir
Amicus Curiae:
Foundation for Government Accountability, John R. Ashcroft, Young Black Lawyers' Organizing Coalition and others
Petitioner:
Public Interest Legal Foundation, Harris County Republican Party, Dallas County Republican Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Texas State LULAC et al v. Elfant et al
as 1:2021cv00546
Defendant:
Jacquelyn Callanen, Bruce Elfant, Isabel Longoria and others
Plaintiff:
Texas State LULAC and Voto Latino
Petitioner:
Lupe C. Torres, Terrie Pendley and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramone, et al v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2017cv00825
Plaintiff:
Raymond Vincent Ramone and Rita Yvonne Ramone
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Andres Recinos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
RAMONE et al v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2017at00476
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND VINCENT RAMONE and RITA YVONNE RAMONE
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
RAMONE et al
as 1:2017at00475
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND VINCENT RAMONE and RITA YVONNE RAMONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
