Cases 1 - 10 of 12
WHITFIELD v. MOMENTIVE GLOBAL, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
MOMENTIVE GLOBAL, INC., SUSAN L DECKER, DAVID EBERSMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BACCHUS et al
as 2:2021cv03681
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MOHAMED BACCHUS and ALAN ZANDER
Intervenor Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MIZERNY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ZANDER v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00653
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP, MCKESSON CORPORATION and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ZANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZANDERS v. HAMOR
as 3:2018cv00197
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ZANDERS
Defendant:
R. HAMOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
STITT v. ZANDER et al
as 5:2013cv04552
Plaintiff:
GLENN S. STITT
Defendant:
AMY K. ZANDER and MONICA R. LUTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZANDER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41151
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN A. ZANDER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ZANDER v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67798
Plaintiff:
WALTER ZANDER
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AW CHESTERTON COMPANY , ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZANDERS v. OFFICER FERKO et al
as 3:2010cv00009
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ZANDERS
Defendant:
OFFICER FERKO, DEPUTY GLUNT and SUPERINTENDENT ROZUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. F&W, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00536
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., ESTATE OF TYRONE G. KERSEY, STATE ONE MUSIC AMERICA LLC and others
Defendant:
F&W, INC. and LOUIS J. GRIPPO
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
ZANDERS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2008cv01455
Petitioner:
ANTHONY ZANDERS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
