Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Seaman v. City of Newton, Iowa et al
as 4:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Zachary Clark Seaman
Defendant:
City of Newton, Iowa, Rob Burdess, Randy Oldfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16128
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. Clark
as 21-1279
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Zachary Clark, AKA Talha, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, AKA Omar Kabir, AKA Omar Shishani
United States v. Clark
as 21-6034
Defendant / Appellant:
ZACHARY CLARK, AKA Little Rue
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv93202
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv44889
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv58122
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv17653
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08957
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
