Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Zajac v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Zajac
Defendant:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
ASBURY et al v. EQT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv01005
Plaintiff:
RONALD AND TRACY LOVRICH, DONALD AND JULIA NEWTON, JOSEPH AND AMY HEBDA and others
Defendant:
EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY, EQT MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, L.P., EQT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
VERSITECH, INC. v. ZAJAC et al
as 2:2015cv00654
Plaintiff:
VERSITECH, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN F. ZAJAC , RICHARD MARCHESE and INDUSTRIAL INSULATION AND COATINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
MEADOWLANDS COMPANY et al v. ZAJAC et al
as 2:2015cv01105
Plaintiff:
MEADOWLANDS COMPANY and BROOK W MURPHY
Defendant:
ERIC G. ZAJAC , ZAJAC, ARIAS & TRICHON, PC and ROBERT A VORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hammonds v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2014cv00527
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Hammonds
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John Wetzel, Shirley Moore Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zajac v. Amato
as 1:2012cv02153
Plaintiff:
Lauren Zajac
Defendant:
David Amato
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 200
NGUYEN v. ZAJAC
as 2:2011cv07662
Plaintiff:
THAUN NGUYEN
Defendant:
MARION ZAJAC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
