Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ZHANG v. DORRANCE PUBLISHING CO. et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
JEFF BAOLIANG ZHANG
Defendant:
DORRANCE PUBLISHING CO., MICHAEL KNAPP and VICKIE KOWALECKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
United States of America v. Zhang
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dan Zhang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
ZHANG v. CSL BEHRING LLC
as 2:2023cv02658
Plaintiff:
ZHENGJIA ZHANG
Defendant:
CSL BEHRING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Huber v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00931
Plaintiff:
Christine Huber
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., Sparkle-Um, Lichun Zhang d/b/a Sparkle-Um and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ZHANG v. CLIFFORD et al
as 2:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
HUOFA MICHAEL ZHANG
Defendant:
JUDGE DANIEL CLIFFORD and COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
