Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 502
M&D Peterson, LLC v. SIKA AG et al
as 1:2024cv03056
Not Yet Classified: IN RE CONCRETE & CEMENT ADDITIVES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff: M&D Peterson, LLC
Defendant: Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Concrete and Cement Additives Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2024md03097
Not Yet Classified: Concrete and Cement Additives Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: SMBA Construction, LLC, Charles W. Hughes Construction, LLC, Lucas Contracting, LLC and others
Defendant: Chryso, Inc., Cinven Ltd., Cinven, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 26 Suit for injunctive relief re violation antitrust laws
Ferguson, et al. v. Smith, et al.
as 24-2407
Plaintiff: CAROL FERGUSON and LYNDA FREEMAN, on behalf of themselves and, in addition, on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant: MARIA SMITH, an individual, GLADSTONE AUTO, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company and CARROS, INC., an Oregon corporation
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way Over Land in Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2024cv00029
Plaintiff: United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant: Additional Rights, Etc., More or Less, in Bedford County Tennessee, and, Manuel Quinonez Silvestre, PennyMac Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
United States of America v. Additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way Over Land in Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Defendant: Additional Rights, Etc., More or Less, in Bedford County Tennessee, and, Dr. John H. Gilmore, Vickie S. Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
Trustees of the Plumbers Local Union No. 1 Welfare Fund, Additional Security Benefit Fund, Vacation & Holiday Fund, Trade Education Fund, 401(k) Savings Plan et al v. Temperini Mechanical, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01180
Plaintiff: Trustees of the United Association National Pension Fund, Trustees of the Plumbers Local Union No. 1 Welfare Fund, Additional Security Benefit Fund, Vacation & Holiday Fund, Trade Education Fund, 401(k) Savings Plan, Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and others
Defendant: Temperini Mechanical, Inc. and Joseph Temperini
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Sweet Additions Ingredient Processors, LLC v. Meelunie America, Inc.
as 24-10335
Plaintiff: SWEET ADDITIONS INGREDIENT PROCESSORS, LLC
Defendant: MEELUNIE AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv17041
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Easements and Rights-of-Way over 0.37 acre of Land, More or Less, and additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way over Land in Clinton County, Kentucky et al
as 1:2023cv00162
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Easements and Rights-of-Way over 0.37 acre of Land, More or Less, and additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way over Land in Clinton County, Kentucky, Luther C. Conner, Jr. and Susan Conner
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Actions re: rights of Tennessee Valley Authority
motley v. JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv10268
Plaintiff: janae rocquel motley
Defendant: JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al, Dymarion Rashad Brooks Estate et al, Derrion Rashad Brooks Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?