Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Roberts et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2011mc00051
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Roberts and Marshall H. Murdock
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Derrick R. Schofield, Ruben Hodge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Murdock et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2011mc00041
Plaintiff:
Marshall H. Murdock, Charles H. Roberts, Julius Perkins and others
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Derrick R. Scholfield, Ruben Hodge and others
Roberts v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv00294
Petitioner:
Charles H Roberts
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Derrick R Schofield, Ruben Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crawley v. Parker et al
as 1:2010cv01205
Plaintiff:
Roscoe T. Crawley
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Harold Butler, Brenda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Little et al
as 2:2009cv02654
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Jenkins
Defendant:
George Little, Rueben Hodge, William Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Little et al
as 3:2009cv00947
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Jenkins
Defendant:
George Little, Rueben Hodge, William Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Cole, et al v. Tennessee Department of Correc, et al
as 09-5590
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. COLE
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHALL H. MURDOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, DONNA WHITE and others
Robert Cole, et al v. Tennessee Department of Correc, et al
as 09-5556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT E. COLE
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL H. MURDOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, DONNA WHITE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
