Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Nelson v. American Mercury Lloyds Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv02098
Plaintiff:
Chantel Nelson
Defendant:
American Mercury Lloyds Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Otero v. Haftopulos et al
as 4:2024cv02147
Defendant:
B R Williams Trucking, Inc. and Christopher Allen Haftopulos
Plaintiff:
Chantel Otero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 American Disabilities Act of 1990
Cavazos et al v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC
as 4:2022cv02963
Counter Defendant:
Miguel Cavazos and Chantel Cavazos
Defendant:
Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wyche v. Office Of The Attorney General et al
as 4:2022cv02923
Plaintiff:
Gery Garnnett Wyche
Defendant:
Office Of The Attorney General, Wayne E. Revack, Robert D Wendell and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Richardson v. Blevins et al
as 1:2021cv00697
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Richardson
Defendant:
Officer FNU Blevins, Officer FNU Jones, Immigration Control and Enforcement and others
Richardson v. Blevins et al
as 1:2021cv00794
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Richardson
Defendant:
Officer FNU Blevins, Officer FNU Jones, Immigration Control and Enforcement and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
