Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dowdy v. Vantell et al
as 3:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Antwion Dowdy
Defendant:
Warden Vincent Vantell, Core Civic, Inc., f/n/u Cockrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Key v. CoreCivic Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00920
Plaintiff:
Scottie Allen Key
Defendant:
CoreCivic Inc., Chief f/n/u Porter and Unit Manager Lybranca Cockrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Rudd, et al
as 2:2023cv02030
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
F/N/U Rudd, F/N/U Porter and F/N/U Buford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Key v. Core Civic of America et al
as 3:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
Scott Allen Key
Defendant:
Core Civic of America, Warden M. Frink, Chief (f/n/u) Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bumpus v. Porter et al
as 3:2021cv00531
Plaintiff:
Patrick L. Bumpus and Zakiya
Defendant:
Captain f/n/u Porter, Lt. f/n/u McDavis, Unit Manager f/n/u Bermudez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Byrd et al
as 3:2021cv00119
Defendant:
Warden Raymond Byrd, Vincent Vantell, Sgt. f/n/u Hawkins and others
Plaintiff:
William Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyle v. Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv00864
Plaintiff:
Robert Douglas Lyle
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Tennessee, ABL Food Service, f/n/u Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2014cv01899
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, (f/n/u) Porter, (f/n/u) Dethrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
Richard Michael Ford
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Corrections, Jerry Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
