Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 3:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muse v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
Gavin Muse
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America doing business as CoreCivic, Jerry Wardlow, f/n/u Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Lawrence et al
as 3:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Antonius Carter
Defendant:
Mimi Lawrence, Chief Austin Boldie, Corporal Eric Yevin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02547
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Eichstaedt, et al
as 3:2019cv00515
Defendant:
f/n/u Grant, f/n/u Thomas, f/n/u Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Broots and Christopher Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
Deandre Blake
Defendant:
Dustin Mackin, f/n/u Thomas, Unnamed Member #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bundren v. Hallbrooks et al
as 1:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bundren
Defendant:
Daniel Hallbrooks, (f/n/u) Thomas and (f/n/u) Mackin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crockett v. Hawkins et al
as 3:2016cv02059
Plaintiff:
Corey Crockett
Defendant:
Kizzy Hawkins, f/n/u Thomas, f/n/u Rycher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bostic v. Thomas et al
as 3:2016cv00900
Petitioner:
Yvonne D. Bostic
Respondent:
f/n/u Thomas , TDOC and Metro Gov.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
