Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Handy v. North Shore Healthcare et al
as 0:2023cv02253
Plaintiff:
Lutisha Handy
Defendant:
North Shore Healthcare, Gregory Hanson, Kate Postier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Handy Stop et al
as 0:2021cv01696
Plaintiff:
Brenda Ann Smith
Defendant:
Handy Stop and Stuart Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Handy Jones v. City of St. Paul, Minnesota et al
as 0:2020cv00707
Defendant:
Jordan Wild, Todd Axtell, Nathaniel Younce and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Diane Handy Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Handy Jones v. City of Saint Paul et al
as 0:2017cv01145
Plaintiff:
Kim Diane Handy Jones
Defendant:
City of Saint Paul , Mikko Norman, Nathaniel Younce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv00737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Handy v. Organon USA, Inc. et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2010cv02330
Plaintiff:
Dianelle M. Handy
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc., Organon International, Inc. and Merck & Co, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Handi Medical Supply, Inc.
as 0:2008cv05363
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jones
Defendant:
Handi Medical Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 USERRA-Uniformed Svs. Employment & Reemployment Rights Act
Thames et al v. KFC Corporation
as 0:2008cv00113
Plaintiff:
David Thames, David Thames, David Thames and others
Defendant:
KFC Corporation, KFC Corporation and KFC Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Handy v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP et al
as 0:2007cv00464
Plaintiff:
Dianne Handy, Dianne Handy, Dianne Handy and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, AstraZeneca LP and Zeneca Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
