Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Parisienne v. Iheartmedia, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00499
Plaintiff:
Theodore Parisienne
Defendant:
Iheartmedia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
IHeart Communications, Inc. v. Citibank, N.A.
as 5:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
AMFM Broadcasting Licenses, LLC, AMFM Broadcasting, Inc., AMFM Operating Inc. and others
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A., U.S. Bank National Association, UMB Bank, National Association and others
Trustee:
UMB Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
Eden Surgical Center v. iHeartMedia, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09277
Plaintiff:
Eden Surgical Center
Defendant:
iHeartMedia, Inc. and iHeartmedia Group Health Plan
Philpot v. Iheartmedia, Inc.
as 1:2016cv09156
Plaintiff:
Larry Philpot
Defendant:
Iheartmedia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Guada Technologies LLC v. iHeartMedia, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01151
Plaintiff:
Guada Technologies LLC
Defendant:
iHeartMedia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ponderosa Twins Plus One et al v. iHeartMedia, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv05648
Plaintiff:
Ponderosa Twins Plus One and Ricky Spicer
Defendant:
iHeartMedia, Inc., Spotify USA Inc., Google, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
In Re: Southgate
as 16-2206
Petitioner:
JEREMY CHRISTOPHER SOUTHGATE
Respondent:
SOUNDSPARK, INC, ANA VILLANUEVA, CHRISTOPHER NOLTE and others
In Re: Southgate
as 16-2206
Petitioner:
JEREMY CHRISTOPHER SOUTHGATE
Respondent:
WARNER BROS., INC., SOUNDSPARK, INC, ANA VILLANUEVA and others
Kanongataa v. Iheartmedia, Inc.
as 1:2016cv07471
Plaintiff:
Kali Kanongataa
Defendant:
Iheartmedia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Ponderosa Twins Plus One et al v. iHeartMedia, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02258
Plaintiff:
Ponderosa Twins Plus One and Ricky Spicer
Defendant:
iHeartMedia, Inc., Spotify USA, Inc., Google, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
