Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Lackey v. Sims et al
as 2:2014cv00204
Plaintiff:
Raymond Willis Lackey
Defendant:
Randall Sims and NFN Woodburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Justin Lackey
as 14-10670
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUSTIN WYATT LACKEY
USA v. Derek Lackey
as 14-10614
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DEREK RAY LACKEY
Conely v. Lee et al
as 1:2014cv00242
Defendant:
Heather Brock, Jodi Robyn Chancellor, Natasha Drumgoole and others
Plaintiff:
Vallie Conely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Roach v. Berland et al
as 3:2013cv04640
Plaintiff:
Mark Roach
Defendant:
Bob Berland , Shawn Lackey and Tyler Chastain
Counter_claimant:
Shawn Lackey , Bob Berland and Tyler Chastain
Counter_defendant:
Mark Roach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roach v. Berland et al
as 4:2013cv02616
Plaintiff:
Mark Roach
Defendant:
Bob Berland , Shawn Lackey and Tyler Chastain
Counter_claimant:
Shawn Lackey , Bob Berland and Tyler Chastain
Counter_defendant:
Mark Roach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lackey et al v. PNC Mortgage et al
as 7:2013cv00490
Defendant:
PNC Mortgage and Federal National Mortgage Association
Plaintiff:
John L Lackey and Melissa Lackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muchaw v. Lackey et al
as 4:2012cv03101
Plaintiff:
Carrie Muchaw
Defendant:
Dennis Wayne Lackey and Sunbelt Furniture Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Banargent v. Schultz-LacKey
as 7:2012cv00103
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Banargent
Defendant:
Sarah Schultz-LacKey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Lackey v. Stephen Hurt, Sr., et al
as 12-40461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH D. LACKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN HURT, Sr., Medical Practice Manager, W. TURNER, Nurse, Beto Unit and J. BECRAFT, Law Library Supervisor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
