Cases 1 - 10 of 219
LAWLER v. STANCIL et al
as 2:2022cv03801
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LAWLER
Defendant:
KYLE STANCIL, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
COBB et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv02924
Plaintiff:
DIONNE COBB and ANTHONY LAWLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Marrow v. Lawler et al
as 1:2019cv01690
Defendant:
Mrs. Granuland, Rose A. McKinney, Mrs. Susan Wolfe and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Marrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER v. THE PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2018cv00646
Plaintiff:
ANDRE D. BUTLER
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY and STACEY A. LAWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWLER v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv02932
Plaintiff:
DONNA LAWLER
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WILSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv05563
Plaintiff:
GARY WILSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, SANDRA K. KNEEDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2014cv00401
Petitioner:
DEWAYNE JACKSON
Respondent:
RAYMOND M. LAWLER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dominguez v. Rendell et al
as 1:2013cv02842
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Dominguez
Defendant:
Rendell, Jeffrey Beard, Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shakur v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2012cv02208
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Tabb Bickell, R. Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. HOGELAND et al
as 2:2012cv03347
Plaintiff:
NOBLE J. CORBIN-BEY
Defendant:
H. WARREN HOGELAND, PHILADELPHIA TRAFFIC COURT, BOOT AND TOW DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
