Cases 1 - 10 of 12
McDermott v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv11828
Plaintiff:
Cole McDermott
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, State of Maine, State of Massachusetts and others
Intervenor Defendant:
American Property Management Corp., James T. Lichoulas, Rita Lichoulas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America et al v. Anthem, Inc. et al
as 1:2016mc91372
Plaintiff:
United States of America, District of Columbia, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant:
Anthem, Inc. and CIGNA Corporation
Nugent v. State of Maine
as 1:2016cv11664
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Nugent, III
Defendant:
State of Maine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Demos, Jr v. The United State of America et al
as 1:2015cv12906
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
The United State of America, The State of Maine, The State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Gibbs v. Dix et al
as 1:2011cv10595
Plaintiff:
Kipp R. Gibbs
Defendant:
Dorothea Dix and State of Maine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. State of Maine et al
as 1:2010cv10167
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann Murphy
Defendant:
State of Maine, Michaela Murphy, Norman Croteau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. State of Maine
as 1:2010cv10010
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann Murphy
Defendant:
State of Maine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. State of Maine et al
as 1:2009cv12228
Petitioner:
Carol Murphy
Respondent:
State of Maine and Michaela Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. State of Maine
as 1:2009cv11643
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann Murphy
Defendant:
State of Maine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bourque v. State of Maine
as 1:2009cv10488
Petitioner:
William Bourque
Respondent:
State of Maine
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
