Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
VITO v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2024cv00702
Plaintiff: ELIZABETH VITO
Cross Defendant: SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Defendant: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION A/K/A AMTRAK, ABC COMPANIES (FICTITIOUS DESIGNATION OF PARTNERSHIPS, PROPRIETORSHIPS, AND/OR CORPORATIONS WHO OWNED AND/OR CONTROLLED THE PROPERTY AT ISSUE) and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION doing business as AMTRAK
Other: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
YOUNG v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2023cv03054
Plaintiff: ROBERT YOUNG
Defendant: SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION doing business as AMTRAK, ABC COMPANIES (FICTITIOUS DESIGNATION OF PARTNERSHIPS, PROPRIETORSHIPS, AND/OR CORPORATIONS WHO OWNED AND/OR CONTROLLED OF THE PROPERTY AT ISSUE) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PARKER v. HAALAND et al
as 2:2022cv05049
Plaintiff: JAMAL DARIUS PARKER Moor Beneficiary a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in propria persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae d/b/a Jamal El Trust
Defendant: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND d/b/a Debra Anne Haaland, secretary of the interior et al.,, MERRICK BRIAN GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND attorney general et al.,, ANDREW MARSHALL SAUL d/b/a ANDREW SAUL commissioner et al., and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRAMBLETT et al v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv04405
Plaintiff: ANDREW BRAMBLETT and MELISSA BRAMBLETT, H/W
Defendant: ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ABC COMPANIES (fictitious designation of partnerships, proprietorships, and/or corporations who insured and/or controlled the insurance of the property at issue) and John Does and/or Jane Does (fictitious designation of individual (s) who insured
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GAD v. RIVERA et al
as 2:2022cv04393
Plaintiff: AHMED FEISAL GAD
Defendant: SEARGENT RIVERA, DEPUTY BRADLEY, SECURITY OFFICERS WHO SEARCHED MY CELLL 2033 AT D BLOCK ON JULY 16/2022 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOTEN v. THE BOPPY COMPANY, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv04341
Plaintiff: ZALEIPH WOOTEN and TAWANA PATINA REID
Defendant: THE BOPPY COMPANY, LLC, WALMART INC., ARTSANA U.S.A., INC. d/b/a CHICCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
HARLEY v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02732
Plaintiff: MARY HARLEY
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, VETERANS MEDICAL (CLINIC) CENTER, ALL NURSES ON THE 7TH FL. 7 WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PITTS et al v. PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY C/O INTEGRITY INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01963
Plaintiff: DANAIRA L. PITTS and DEMETRIUS D. PITTS
Defendant: PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY, JOHN/JANE DOE (FICTITIOUS PARTY WHO MAY BE THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR AND/OR LESSEE AND/OR LESSOR OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE WHICH CAUSED THE APRIL 20, 2018 COLLISION WITH PLAINTIFF'S VEHCILE) and ABC, INC. AND XYZ, CO. (LICENSED INSURANCE COMPANY WHO WROTE A MOTOR VEHICLE POLICY PROVIDING COVERAGE ON THE AUTOMOBILE PLAINTIFF, DANAIRA L. PITTS WAS PERMISSIVELY DRIVING ON APRIL 20, 2018 WHEN INV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BEITLER v. City of Allentown et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00104
Plaintiff: COREY BEITLER
Defendant: City of Allentown, Lehigh County, PrimeCare Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. JUNE et al
as 2:2021cv03683
Plaintiff: DARRON THOMAS
Defendant: CHAD JUNE, ASHLEY BANKS, DANIELLE M. OUTLAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?