Cases 41 - 50 of 232,217
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. delivery.com, LLC
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
delivery.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Five Guys Properties, LLC
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Five Guys Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Roark Capital, Inc. d/b/a Subway
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Roark Capital, Inc. d/b/a Subway
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DriverDo, LLC v. Social Auto Transport, Inc.
as 24-1764
Plaintiff:
DRIVERDO, LLC, dba Draiver
Defendant:
SOCIAL AUTO TRANSPORT, INC., dba HopDrive
Astellas Pharma, Inc. v. Lupin Ltd.
as 24-1766
Plaintiff:
ASTELLAS PHARMA, INC., ASTELLAS IRELAND CO., LTD. and ASTELLAS PHARMA GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Defendant:
LUPIN LTD., LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC. and others
DriverDo, LLC v. Social Auto Transport, Inc.
as 24-1385
Plaintiff:
DRIVERDO, LLC, d/b/a Draiver
Defendant:
SOCIAL AUTO TRANSPORT, INC., d/b/a HopDrive
Fairly Odd Treasures, LLC v. Fulton DS
as 24-1748
Plaintiff:
FAIRLY ODD TREASURES, LLC
Defendant:
FULTON DS
Telsync Technologies LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Telsync Technologies LLC
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Infogation Corporation v. Panasonic Automotive Systems Co., Ltd.
as 2:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Infogation Corporation
Defendant:
Panasonic Automotive Systems Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Darden Restaurants, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
