Cases 1 - 10 of 22,116
Westlake v. Eureka Springs Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Emerson Tron Westlake
Defendant:
Eureka Springs Police Department, Tim Holm and Does Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. WC Dub Brassel Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Gordon Dean Pickens, Jr
Defendant:
WC Dub Brassel Detention Center, Lincoln County Detention Center, Steve Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dykes v. Dutton et al
as 2:2024cv02058
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lane Dykes, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer Dutton, Officer Flippin, Detective Dalton Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buckley v. Marshall et al
as 6:2024cv06065
Plaintiff:
Arsenio Buckley
Defendant:
Jailer Zack Marshall, Jailer Jodie Law and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marbley v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jaster Lee Marbley
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Solomon Graves and N Faust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowley v. Lemons et al
as 4:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Crowley
Defendant:
Lemons, Lee, Arce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaney v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
James Robert Chaney
Defendant:
Branden Davis, Dale Reed, Antonio D Johnson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pullen v. Does
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Wendel Pullen
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
