Cases 11 - 20 of 425,927
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
REED-GRAVES v. USA
as 2:2024cv00640
Petitioner:
DOMINIQUE REED-GRAVES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
JACKSON v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2024cv00638
Petitioner:
STEVEN JACKSON
Respondent:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY PRISON and INTERIM WARDEN SHANE DADY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING V. SHAPIRO
as 2:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING
Defendant:
PA GOVERNOR JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GATELEY v. STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ALBION et al
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
DENNIS GATELEY
Defendant:
STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ALBION, COMMONWEALTH OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DANNEY HARMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALKHATIB v. RICHARDS et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
LATIF ALKHATIB
Defendant:
M. RICHARDS, E. BROWN, R. WESTOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
PAULA JEAN BROWN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Carty v. Pennsylvania Parole Board et al
as 1:2024cv00733
Petitioner:
Donald Charles Carty
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Parole Board and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rockwell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Rockwell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
