Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv07682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Worlds Inc. v. Activision Blizzard Inc.
as 21-1990
Defendant / Appellee:
ACTIVISION PUBLISHING, INC., ACTIVISION BLIZZARD INC. and BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WORLDS INC.
AML IP, LLC v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
as 6:2021cv00184
Plaintiff:
AML IP, LLC
Defendant:
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. v. AML IP, LLC
as 8:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
Defendant:
AML IP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
AML IP, LLC v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
as 6:2021cv00038
Plaintiff:
AML IP, LLC
Defendant:
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Sacco v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02330
Defendant:
Mouseflow, Inc. and Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brian Sacco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sacco v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 2:2020at01155
Defendant:
Mouseflow, Inc. and Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brian Sacco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv05540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. v. Joyfun Inc Co., Limited et al
as 8:2019cv01582
Defendant:
WANG HAO a/k/a HOWELL WANG, DOE 2 a/k/a SIMDEV, ZROAD (HONGKONG) CO., LIMITED d/b/a INSTANTFUNS and others
Plaintiff:
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Via Vadis, LLC v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
as 19-2269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIA VADIS, LLC and AC TECHNOLOGIES S.A.
Defendant / Appellee:
BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and AMAZON.COM, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.