Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Abrego v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00230
Plaintiff:
Abel Abrego
Defendant:
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McRo, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games America
as 15-1080
Defendant / Appellee:
DISNEY INTERACTIVE STUDIOS, INC., SCE SANTA MONICA STUDIO INC., BANDAI NAMCO GAMES AMERICA INC. and others
Amicus Curiae:
BSA I THE SOFTWARE ALLIANCE, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MCRO, INC., dba Planet Blue
Via Vadis, LLC et al v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00810
Plaintiff:
AC Technologies, S.A. and Via Vadis, LLC
Defendant:
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. v. Does
as 8:2014cv00781
Plaintiff:
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
Defendant:
Does
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc v. Ceiling Fan Software, LLC et al
as 1:2014mc00017
Plaintiff:
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc
Defendant:
Ceiling Fan Software, LLC, Brian Becker and Stanton Fraser
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. v. Ceiling Fan Software, LLC et al
as 1:2014mc00027
Plaintiff:
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
Defendant:
Ceiling Fan Software, LLC, Brian Becker, Stanton Fraser and others
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. v. Ceiling Fan Software, LCC et al
as 3:2014mc00030
Plaintiff:
Blizzard Entertainment Inc
Defendant:
Ceiling Fan Software, LCC, Brian Becker, Stanton Fraser and others
Amanda Lewis v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., et al
as 13-17391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMANDA LEWIS, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., a Delaware Corporation and BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a Delaware Corporation
Babbage Holdings LLC v Activision Blizzard Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00750
Plaintiff:
Babbage Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Activision Blizzard, Inc. , Activision Inc. and Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
