Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Garry Moore v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 13-60005
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARRY LEE MOORE
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, COUNTY OF MONROE, CITY OF ABERDEEN and others
Webster v. Epps et al
as 3:2012cv00858
Plaintiff:
Melissa Elaine Webster
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, James Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ollie Evans v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 12-60944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
EMMITT SPARKMAN, COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER EPPS, JOHNNIE DENMARK, also known as John Doe and others
Russell v. Epps et al
as 5:2012cv00160
Plaintiff:
Kevin Russell
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, Robert Sturdivant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Stern v. Emmitt Sparkman
as 12-60890
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES H. STERN
Respondent - Appellee:
EMMITT SPARKMAN, Deputy Commissioner and Superintendent of Mississippi State Penitentiary
Smith v. Sparkman et al
as 2:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Ricky Smith
Defendant:
Emmitt Sparkman, Ron King, Regina Hancock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Sparkman et al
as 1:2013cv00503
Plaintiff:
Ricky Smith
Defendant:
Emmitt Sparkman , Ron King , Regina Hancock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ollie Evans v. Blackwell, et al
as 12-60830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
BLACKWELL, ROBERT CHAD, PAT MARLOR and others
Pierce v. Sparkman et al
as 1:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Jairie T. Pierce, Jr.
Defendant:
Emmitt Sparkman, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ollie Evans v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 12-60808
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
RON KING, Superintendent, JAN GUEST, JOHN DOE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
