Cases 101 - 110 of 827,430
Davis, Jr. v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02631
Plaintiff:
Clifford Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Diaz v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02632
Plaintiff:
Edwin Diaz
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Donez v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02635
Plaintiff:
Celia Donez
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Herrin v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02640
Plaintiff:
Paula J. Herrin
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02660
Plaintiff:
Patrick Miller
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kent-Parcell v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02650
Plaintiff:
Kelly Kent-Parcell
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Honeychuck et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02649
Plaintiff:
Debra D. Honeychuck and Martin Honeychuck
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meas v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jerry Meals and Jerry Meas
Defendant:
State of Nevada, James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 wt Removal- Employment (Wrongful Termination)
Antonio et al v. 3M Company Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Alexis Antonio, Doyle Hamilton, Maria Hamilton and others
Defendant:
3M Company Inc, Toray Fluorofibers (America) Inc and Daikin America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
