Cases 71 - 80 of 250
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ODELL v. CIT BANK et al
as 2:2017cv01850
Plaintiff:
DREMA ODELL
Defendant:
CIT BANK and SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Harkey v. Select Portfolio Servicing, et al
as 17-15683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HARKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, US BANK NA, CSMC MORTGAGE BACKED TRUST 2007-6 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rosalind Warren v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 17-10330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSALIND WARREN
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., MERSCORP, INCORPORATED, SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED and others
Engvaldsen v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv01523
Plaintiff:
Eric Engvaldsen
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation and Safeguard Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Safeguard Properties Management, LLC v. MidFirst Bank
as 1:2017cv00565
Plaintiff:
Safeguard Properties Management, LLC
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Engvaldsen v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv01523
Defendant:
"John Does" and/or "Jane Does" #1-25, PHH Mortgage Corporation and Safeguard Properties, LLC
Plaintiff:
Eric Engvaldsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
MidFirst Bank v. Safeguard Properties LLC
as 5:2017cv00231
Petitioner:
MidFirst Bank
Respondent:
Safeguard Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watson v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 1:2017cv01199
Plaintiff:
Nicholas C. Watson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank and Safeguard Properties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
