Cases 1 - 10 of 141,737
Mobley v. FBOP - MCDOWELL
as 3:2025cv00038
Petitioner:
Kenneth Mobley
Respondent:
FBOP - MCDOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fincham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00019
Plaintiff:
Crystal Dawn Fincham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. Buckhannon-Upshur Circuit Court
as 2:2025cv00154
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Buckhannon-Upshur Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Copen v. Downey et al
as 2:2025cv00152
Plaintiff:
Dennis Copen
Defendant:
Prosecutor Josh Downey, Officer J.T. Lanier and Sheriff Philip Dever
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Jackson County Circuit Court et al
as 2:2025cv00155
Defendant:
Judge R. Craig Tatterson, Jackson County Circuit Court, Richard Craig Tatterson and others
Plaintiff:
Jaylen Dalaino Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. NewRez LLC
as 3:2025cv00156
Plaintiff:
Sheila L. Clark
Defendant:
NewRez LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Hayes v. Marshall et al
as 3:2025cv00037
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hayes
Defendant:
Commissioner William K. Marshall, Jamie Gray, Northern Correctional Nurse Practitioner Lacey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. BOP/FPC Alderson et al
as 1:2025cv00151
Petitioner:
Paige Nicole Johnson
Respondent:
BOP/FPC Alderson and Warden Lefeever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lester v. Jones
as 1:2025cv00153
Plaintiff:
Darius Lester
Defendant:
Senior Trooper J. I. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilburn v. United States
as 5:2025cv00057
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
