Cases 1 - 10 of 14,075
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Backry et al v. United States Space Force et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Stanley Michael Backry, JR and Catherine Backry
Defendant:
United States Space Force, United States Air Force and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Oshkosh Defense, LLC et al v. Team Eagle Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Oshkosh Defense, LLC and Pierce Manufacturing Inc.
Defendant:
Team Eagle Inc. and Team Eagle Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Tucker v. USA
as 1:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
Steven Tucker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
USA v. Sig Sauer Sig M400 Rifle
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Sig Sauer Sig M400 Rifle
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Lovering v. Brewster Academy
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Lydia Lovering
Defendant:
Brewster Academy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MORTON v. MCLP ASSET COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
KURT MORTON
Defendant:
MCLP ASSET COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
US Department of Labor, Acting Secretary of Labor v. Ulster Property Services, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
ULSTER PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC d/b/a ULSTER PROPERTY SERVICES and Kieran Rice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
