Cases 41 - 50 of 15,441
Castro-Mota v. Miesel, ET AL
as 3:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Santos Castro-Mota
Defendant:
Dale Miesel, CO. and Superintenden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTRO-MOTA v. GALLAGHER et al.
as 2:2024cv01628
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT GALLAGHER, CO OFFICER and SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: ANTHONY YORGEY
as 5:2024cv01748
Not Yet Classified:
ANTHONY YORGEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTRO-MOTA v. CLARK et al.
as 2:2024cv01622
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
WARDEN TERREA MOJOR CLARK, C.O. OFFICER, LISA DURANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karl Manuel v. Mark Capozza, et al
as 24-1396
Plaintiff:
KARL B. MANUEL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK CAPOZZA, C/O SERGEANT WILES, C/O. LT. DAILEY and others
CASTRO-MOTA v. GALLAGHER et al.
as 2:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA and SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
MR. GALLAGHER, CO OFFICER and SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTRO-MOTA v. CLARK et al.
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA and SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
TERREA CLARK, WARDEN TERREA MOJOR CLARK, C.O. OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY, L. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcellus Jones v. Robert Gilmore, et al
as 24-1307
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS A. JONES
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, DENISE SMITH, JAMES BRESHAHN and others
ALSTON v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2024cv01574
Plaintiff:
LAMAR ALSTON
Defendant:
SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE, SUPT. SORBER, SUPT. TERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
